Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruce Peters's avatar

When does "yes, and" kick in? Is it before we pollute and cause essentially "roadkill" or after we've we've finally awakened to the consequences of our choices? Could "better late than never be replaced with "better never than too late"? Someone said the other day that we've interpreted freedom as our collective choice to kill each other. Covid is a great example. What we are facing today was an almost inevitable consequence of the choices made prior to its spread. Either by design or by negligence the research or its byproducts were going to escape into the world. It was inevitable. We run around arguing masks or no masks in our collective trip to Abilene. Problem solving versus problem prevention... only becomes necessary in the post mortem of failure to be awake to the needed connections before people die..... not after. Yes, and, humanity can progress but not at the expense of one single solitary human life. Can we progress. yes, and being awake to the inevitable consequences of out choices? It goes back to "what choices will I make to today if I believed that my choices actually mattered and that I was choosing for all humanity"? Sorry, but got started and couldn't hold back. Thayer once said that one common human trait was "perversity". It has never seemed more appropriate than in these times.

Michael Walsh's avatar

Of course, "passing through" can go both ways. We may leave unintended consequences for others (or ourselves) to deal with and/or clean up. We can also allow learning to pass through us as well, not only about the environment, as we discover links between our actions and their consequences, but also our experiences and wisdom, in all facets of life as well. Hence the power of books, courses, and Netflix series like Connected. Just another form of "passing through".

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?